Having read the blog article you linked to, I have to say the blogger sounds a lot like our neo-conservative US political media "pundits" ... mostly a lot of hot air, presenting incorrect information as fact, with an attitude of "poor us, look how badly we're being treated by those mean liberal elitists", but with no real conception of what is really going on.
For example, this:
Quote:
|
The emergence of Sarah Palin, decried because she has big hair, home-town values, five children with names such as Track, Willow and Bristol - and apparently no experience compared to the community organising Democrat Obama - worried the chattering classes even more.
|
No, Sarah Palin was decried because she was a religious fundie fanatic airhead who wanted to conquer the world for Jesus, was an embarrassment to womankind and couldn't govern her way out of a paper bag. Even top Republican officials admitted publicly that Palin was not ready to be president, and that's the job of the vice president.
Quote:
|
Wouldn’t this charismatic, conservative woman from small town Wasilla surely play into the racism of American voters, went the political orthodoxy.
|
I am not aware of any "political orthodoxy" that said in advance that Palin was going to play into the racism of the American voters. When McCain named her as his running mate, I was willing to give her a chance, and I suspect most of us were.
The fact is that she came out of the gate playing into the fears and insecurities of a certain group of Americans (the Republican Party's base), and some of those fears are indeed racially-based. That is a fact, and that was her standard
modus operandi. Divide and conquer, us against them, they're dangerous and out to get you, etc. At the end, that's all the McCain campaign seemed to have. Fortunately it didn't work.
Quote:
|
Now, I’m sure there are many Americans who did not vote for Obama because he is black.
|
I'm not sure what to say to that, except to laugh. Almost 64 million people voted for Obama. Most of them were white, and many of them live in traditionally conservative areas of the country, including the Southern states of Virginia and Florida. I doubt seriously that most of them voted that way because Obama is black. We have much more serious things to worry about right now than ideological posturing.
I am sure that some people did vote for Obama because of his race. Many voted against him for the same reason. But most of us voted for him because we have been losing hope, losing faith in America and in our future.
Quote:
|
But there is more to this “change” election than policy. This has been dubbed an historic, once in a generation, 21st century presidential election in large part because Obama is black.
|
IMO, the main reason this election was historically significant was not because of Obama's race, but because it connotes a sea change in Americans' value system. The beauty of this election is that we voted for the person we thought would do the better job of leading us out of this mess and into the future, regardless of what his race is.
One has to wonder what this blogger's real problem is. *whine whine whine* . "Poor me, poor me, poor me. Those liberals are picking on us. Mum, he's looking at me. Make him stop looking at me."
I know that there are many people who live their lives with a major sense of grievance, perceiving themselves as helpless victims and making sure everyone knows it. (Some of them are people making millions of dollars a year in income, freaking out because now they might have to pay taxes like the rest of us.) But I have hope now that we are turning away from allowing that kind of low-level attitude to govern our world. Well, we'd damn well better. It's getting tiresome and hasn't been getting us anywhere, fast.
[/rant]
Oh, and to end on a happy note,
Quote:
I've lost the link now but there was also an amusingly satirical item announcing how, since McCain won the presidency, there would be changes - for example "fossil fuel" would become "creationist carbon |
Great line. I'm going to remember that one.